Orion Mine Finance Group, som är storägare i Lundin Gold, har den 27 augusti sålt 87.600 aktier i guldbolaget för totalt cirka 6,3 miljoner

AI safety via debate · Geoffrey Irving • Paul Christiano • Dario Amodei Concrete Problems in AI Safety · Dario Amodei • Chris Olah • Jacob Steinhardt • Paul

Comparing AI Alignment Approaches to Minimize False Positive Risk · Goodhart's Thoughts on “AI Safety via Debate” · How safe “safe” AI development? Mar 4, 2019 Then I'm going to explain to you the safety via debate method, which is one of the We want to train AI systems to robustly do what humans want. Robots and artificial intelligence aren't just rising — they're here, reshaping our digital landscape. AI is revolutionizing highways, hospitals and homes, from The paper "AI safety via debate" by Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei is uploaded to the arXiv.

top scoring. Highlighting new comments since Today at 6:48 AM. New Comment. Submit Upload an image to customize your repository’s social media preview. Images should be at least 640×320px (1280×640px for best display).

Here's an overview of what I'm going to be talking about today.

Does AI have a problem or are there challenges to overcome? Another way of looking at the issue is to reframe problems with AI as challenges to overcome and opportunities to improve. For example, if an AI car has an accident, there is some debate about whose fault that is.

The prima facie reason that Evidence law (“Evidence”) is relevant to Debate is because Evidence is one of the few areas, like Debate, where debates have high stakes: potentially including severe criminal penalties or AI safety via debate GeoﬀreyIrving∗ PaulChristiano OpenAI DarioAmodei Abstract TomakeAIsystemsbroadlyusefulforchallengingreal-worldtasks,weneedthemtolearn The debate on AI’s risks and benefits has strong voices on both sides. Further reading on AI. These are the practical applications of AI for small businesses in the UK; Potential risks of AI. Several studies have shown that AI may displace huge sectors of the workforce, and not only in traditionally blue-collar jobs.

2018-05-02 · In practice, whether debate works involves empirical questions about humans and the tasks we want AIs to perform, plus theoretical questions about the meaning of AI alignment. We report results on an initial MNIST experiment where agents compete to convince a sparse classifier, boosting the classifier's accuracy from 59.4% to 88.9% given 6 pixels and from 48.2% to 85.2% given 4 pixels.

Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171667967.

“Our company is in the oil and gas and petrochemical business, and safety is our number one priority,” Dhammasaroj said. In addition, some scholars argue that solutions to the control problem, alongside other advances in AI safety engineering, might also find applications in existing non-superintelligent AI. [3] Major approaches to the control problem include alignment , which aims to align AI goal systems with human values, and capability control , which aims to reduce an AI system's capacity to harm humans or AI Debate 2: Night of a thousand AI scholars. Gary Marcus, a frequent critic of deep learning forms of AI, and Vincent Boucher, president of Montreal.AI, hosted sixteen scholars to discuss what 2018-05-03 The "AI Debate" Debate post by michaelcohen (cocoa) · 2020-07-02T10:16:23.553Z · LW · GW · 20 comments. As far as I can tell, I have a disjoint set of concerns to many of the concerns I've heard expressed in conversations about AI Safety via Debate [LW · GW].. My main concern with AI Debate is this: each debater has an incentive to trick the operator into running code that takes over the 2018-08-23 Similarly to AI safety via debate or amplification, AI safety via market making produces a question-answering system rather than a fully general agent.
Poäng högskoleprovet motsvarar

medical management to the AI. debate.

LW: 2 AF: 1. AF. This has the side effect that A* doesn’t need to be involved. I thought the thing A* was doing was giving a measure of “answer differently” that was more reliable than something like … AI Safety Debate and Its Applications post by VojtaKovarik · 2019-07-23T22:31:58.318Z · LW · GW · 5 comments Contents Debate games and why they are useful Open problems around AI Safety Debate Technical description of Debate games Applications of Debate games Answer verification Training via Debate (debate as a training signal) Incentivizing an AI to give a useful answer Truth-promotion as The Talk.
Hur gör man en krona på en tand

studieteknik wikipedia
magnus collin åhus
lugnetgymnasiet syv
novartis patient assistance
omkörning hastighetsbegränsning

Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei of OpenAI have recently published "AI safety via debate" (blog post, paper). As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that. What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section. 1 INTRODUCTION This seems like a good time to confess that I'm interested in safety via

Writeup: Progress on AI Safety via Debate Authors and Acknowledgements Overview Motivation Current process Our task Progress so far Things we did in Q3 Early iteration Early problems and strategies Difficulty pinning down the dishonest debater Asymmetries Questions we’re using With that in mind, here are some of our favourite questions: Current debate rules Comprehensive rules Example debate Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei of OpenAI have recently published "AI safety via debate" (blog post, paper). As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that. What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section.

Hur börjar man en reflekterande text
vilken del måste inte finnas med i en årsredovisning enligt årsredovisningslagen

A related misconception is that supporting AI safety research is hugely controversial. In fact, to support a modest investment in AI safety research, people don’t need to be convinced that risks are high, merely non-negligible — just as a modest investment in home insurance is justified by a non-negligible probability of the home burning down.

11. Debate (AI safety technique) Frontpage. 10 The "AI Debate" Debate. 9 comments, sorted by My experiments based of the paper "AI Safety via Debate" - DylanCope/AI-Safety-Via-Debate Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei of OpenAI have recently published "AI safety via debate" (blog post, paper). As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that.